NIST02 Mass Spectral Library and Search Program v2.0 FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

Which EPA analytical methods and Superfund methods suggest the use of the NIST/EPA/NIH  Mass Spectral Library?

What types of new compounds were added and where did the new data come from?

What are NIST's quality assurance criteria?

How do NIST98 and NIST02 compare from a statistical perspective?

What other MS techniques can the NIST02 EI spectra be used with?

Are there any journal articles describing NIST's spectrum evaluation process?

Are there any journal articles relating to search algorithms used in the NIST Search Program?

Is there a demo program available?

How can the NIST Search Program v2.0 be integrated with Agilent's ChemStation(tm) software?


Q: Which EPA RCRA methods and Superfund methods suggest the use of the NIST/EPA/NIH  Mass Spectral Library?

These EPA Superfund Statements of Work (SOWs) cite the NIST/EPA/NIH Mass Spectral Library as a suitable for the requirements of the method.

    Low Concentration Organic Analysis Analytical Method (olc32d.pdf)

    Semivolatile Multi-Concentration Organic Analysis (olm42a-d.pdf)

    Analytical Method for the Analysis of Trace Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds (som10d-trace.pdf)

    Analytical Method for the Analysis of Low/Medium Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds (som10d-lmvoa.pdf)

    Analytical Method for the Analysis of Semivolatile Organic Compounds (som10d-svoa.pdf)

These EPA RCRA methods cite the NIST/EPA/NIH Mass Spectral Library as a suitable for the requirements of the method.

    Semivoltatile Organic Compounds by GC-MS (8270c.pdf)

    Voltatile Organic Compounds by GC-MS(8260b.pdf)

Q:What types of new compounds were added and where did the new data come from?

New spectra were added for:

-new commercially available compounds including drugs and intermediates
-replicates for important compounds
-derivatives (mostly silyl and acyl)
-chemical weapons related compounds (precursors and decomposition products)

These are some of the sources of new spectra. They were all checked by NIST.
14,000  Japan AIST/NIMC Collection Commercially available common organic compounds
6,976  Russian Academy of Sciences
Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis
Mostly Derivatives (silyl, acyl)
7,182  NIH Synthetic analogues of natural compounds, drugs, drug metabolites, and their intermediates
2,400 Asinex Synthetic compounds
1,746  Berlin University (Loewis) Compounds with simple functional groups and  their derivatives
1,735 NIST Commercially available common compounds, pesticides, drugs
1,200  Institute of Elementorganic Chemistry Synthetic compounds, some N-containing cycles
1,022 Eastman Chemical Company Commercial and synthetic compounds and silyl derivatives
749  Spectra from the source "RARE" Common organic compounds
692 CA Lab Services Pesticides & Herbicide
549 University of Missouri Common organic compounds
406 Verifinn (Finland) Chemical weapons and precursors
348 HD-Science (UK) Silyl derivatives of drugs
204 Susan Richardson Halogenated organic compounds
145  Australia (Antolasic) Common compounds, drugs
138  Military Institute of Chemistry and Radiometry (Poland) Warfare agents
19 Koch Institute, Berlin (Melchert) TMS Derivatives of "Vitamin E" family compounds.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Q: What are NIST's quality assurance criteria?

A: New spectra must be complete in every sense. Chemical structures and other chemical information are added, the evaluation process is documented and the data are collected on calibrated instruments.

This is a rough outline of the criteria and process of spectrum evaulation at NIST

Related Chemical Information
-formula
-chemical name and synonym
-chemical structure
-CAS number
-MW consistency

General Rules
-confirm molecular ion and important fragment ions
-origin of [M-X] ions and the most intense peaks
-low mass region
-deduce origin of errors

Compare with Other Spectra
-replicates and isomers
-homologous series
-derivatives
-spectra in other collections

Spectrum Selection
-completeness
-no spurious peaks
-no saturation


Q: How do NIST98 and NIST02 compare from a statistical perspective?

A: The differences are clear.  There are many new spectra covering larger molecules along with better chemical name and CAS number data. Many spectra were rerun in both the main and replicates libraries so the quality of spectra has also increased substantially.
 

NIST98 NIST02  
total spectra 129,136 175,214 +35.7%
spectra with a CAS number 90,311 134,949 +49.4%
spectra with a unique CAS number 69,031 107,105 +55.2%
chemical structures 107,829 147,350 +36.6%
chemical names and synonyms 255,234 440,764 +72.7%
median peak count per spectrum 79 99 +25.3%
average peak count per spectrum 96 111 +15.6%
spectra with less than 20 peaks 12% 5%  
spectra with less than 10 peaks 2% 0.5%  

The NIST02 main library increased from 107,886 compounds to 147,370 compounds.
     91,586 spectra from the NIST98 main library
     1,331 spectra from the NIST98 replicates library
     54,183 new spectra

The NIST02 replicates library increased from 21,250 compounds to 27,844 compounds.
     14,050 spectra from the NIST98 replicates library
     7,378 spectra from the NIST98 main library
     6,416 new spectra

Excluded from NIST02 (nearly all excluded spectra were rerun):
    8,652 spectra from the NIST98 main library
    5,869 spectra from the NIST98 replicates library


Q: What other MS techniques can the NIST02 EI spectra be used with?

A: Most data come from quadropole mass spectromteters.

1) Spectra measured on magnetic sector and TOF instruments can be searched against NIST02 with good results.

2) Searching with ion trap spectra can be productive but the results need to be considered thoughtfully.

NIST compiled this table searching ion trap spectra of pesticides. You can see the results are compare well.
 
Matrix sample GC/MS analysis with NIST98 match factors for quadropole and ion trap data

quadropole ion trap
anthracene-d10- 87 87
chlordane 78 87
chlorothalonil 95 92
chloropropham 95 94
chrysene-d12 87 79
dimethoate 83 72
diphenylamine 99 93
ethion 76 79
methidathion 95 82
methoxychlor 86 61, noisy data
permethrin 91 75
o-phenylphenol 100 96
phosmet 84 co-elutes with trifluralin
pirimiphos methyl 98 90
terbufos 98 85
trifluralin 94 90

Ion trap spectra of small molecules with oxygen, nitrogen, etc., require attention. Small heteratom molecules are known to produce mass spectra that differ between quadropole and ion trap instruments. The differences relate to ion intensities and product ions.

Library searching is difficult when the ion trap spectrum is not unique or the molecular ion is small or nonexistent..

Ion trap spectra of small molecules (MW 50-225) more often than not were found in NIST98.
 
Ion trap spectra the produced top matches in NIST98
acetic acid, 1 methylethyl ester
acetic acid, butyl ester
butanoic acid, 3-oxo, methyl ester
1-butanol
1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol
1-butanol
1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol
1,4-dioxane
ethanol, 2-mercapto-
ethanol, 2-phenoxy-
ethyl acetate
glycerin
hexanal, 2-ethyl-
2-hexanone, 5-methyl-
methylene chloride
N-methyl-N(2hydroxyethyl)carbamic acid, methyl ester
2-propenoic acid, ethyl ester
propananoic acid, 3-ethoxy, ethyl ester
triethylamine
p-xylene
Ion trap spectra that occured within the top 10 hits in NIST98
1-butanol
2-butenal
ethanol, 2-butoxy-
hexane
methane, diethoxy-
pentane
1-propanol
propanpoic acid, 2-methyl, 2-methylpropyl ester
Ion trap spectra that were buried in the hit list in NIST98
1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol
ethanol, 2-ethoxy-
ethyl ether
hexane
octane
1-propanamine

NIST has or shall proceed with the following steps to better accomodate ion trap data.
1) Include ion trap spectra of small molecules in the NIST MS library
2) Modify the library search algorithm with respect to ion trap data.
3) Assess variations in spectra from ion trap instruments.


Q: Are there any journal articles describing NIST's spectrum evaluation process?

A: The Critical Evaluation of a Comprehensive Mass Spectral Library, J Am Soc Mass Spec, 1999, 10, 287-289


Q: Are there any journal articles relating to search algorithms used in the NIST Search Program?

A:

Optimization and Testing of Mass Spectral Library Search Algorithms for Compound Indentification, J Am Soc Mass Spec, 1994, 5, 859-866

Chemical Substructure Indentification by Mass Spectral Library Searching, J Am Soc Mass Spec, 1995, 6, 644-655

Estimating Probablilities of Correct Identification From Results of Mass Spectral Library Searches, J Am Soc Mass Spec, 1994, 5, 316-323


Q: Is there a demo program available?

A: Yes. The demonstration software download is about 9 MB. Click here to download.


Q: How can the NIST Search Program v2.0 be integrated with Agilent's ChemStation(tm) software?

A: The distribution CD has a folder Support.cs with a file menu_mod.wri which describes the several macros used to  run the NIST Search Program v2.0 from the ChemStation menus. The macros are also in the folder.


Click to return to the FDM NIST02 page
 

Click to return to the FDM home page
 

ChemStation is a trademark of Agilent Technologies.